This is a very simple question, what do you think of the way free to play games are going at the moment. examples are TF2, SWTOR, Dota 2. do you think that they have good or bad free to play models, and why.

Views: 29

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 It depends. I like TF2's F2P model, but not SWTOR's. I mean, paying to sprint early on? C'mon. That's just bonkers. Buuuut... They did get money out of me because of that. I couldn't take it. It drove me CRAZY. But the way TF2 does it is nice. That is probably because it was never subscription-based in the first place.

The correct term in most cases is pay to win

 > PlanetSide 2

PlanetSide 2 is not pay to win, all of the weapons are good, it is all down to personal preference. The devs made it so that all the weapons are balanced (or as close as possible to), so that anyone can do well with any weapon.

 I was playing today and I shot a guy a bunch, he spun around and shot me. I died. Wasn't even a headshot. 

what class were you and what was he?

 Both Heavy Assault.

well I don't know what to say... lag maybe...

 No.

I paid £30 to get into the closed beta and i have lots of station cash, and all you can do with it is buy weapon camo or veichel customisations. Apart from that it's useless, since you need perks to use most weapons, which you can buy ingame anyway. (sorry for spelling btw, quickly typing this while finishing some work)

RSS

Advertisements

© 2013   Created by Chandler Hill.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service