This is a very simple question, what do you think of the way free to play games are going at the moment. examples are TF2, SWTOR, Dota 2. do you think that they have good or bad free to play models, and why.
Tags:

Permalink Reply by Chandler Hill on January 28, 2013 at 12:35pm It depends. I like TF2's F2P model, but not SWTOR's. I mean, paying to sprint early on? C'mon. That's just bonkers. Buuuut... They did get money out of me because of that. I couldn't take it. It drove me CRAZY. But the way TF2 does it is nice. That is probably because it was never subscription-based in the first place.

Permalink Reply by Chandler Hill on January 28, 2013 at 2:21pm > PlanetSide 2
Permalink Reply by DeDeling on January 28, 2013 at 5:13pm PlanetSide 2 is not pay to win, all of the weapons are good, it is all down to personal preference. The devs made it so that all the weapons are balanced (or as close as possible to), so that anyone can do well with any weapon.

Permalink Reply by Chandler Hill on January 28, 2013 at 5:16pm I was playing today and I shot a guy a bunch, he spun around and shot me. I died. Wasn't even a headshot.

Permalink Reply by Chandler Hill on January 28, 2013 at 5:22pm Both Heavy Assault.
Permalink Reply by DeDeling on January 28, 2013 at 6:33pm well I don't know what to say... lag maybe...

Permalink Reply by Chandler Hill on January 28, 2013 at 6:45pm No.
Permalink Reply by Traional on January 31, 2013 at 10:32am I paid £30 to get into the closed beta and i have lots of station cash, and all you can do with it is buy weapon camo or veichel customisations. Apart from that it's useless, since you need perks to use most weapons, which you can buy ingame anyway. (sorry for spelling btw, quickly typing this while finishing some work)
© 2013 Created by Chandler Hill.
